Katie Swan vs Ena Koike Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Jun at 04:23 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Swan vs E. Koike

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Swan 1 - 0 Koike
They have played 2 sets in total, with Katie Swan winning 2 and Ena Koike winning 0. The last match between Katie Swan and Ena Koike was at the W35 Decatur, 11-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Katie Swan getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Swan | 1 |
| Koike | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Decatur(06-11-25)
K. Swan vs E. Koike H2H Profile
K. Swan vs E. Koike Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance shows Swan slightly ahead, securing 39.3% of points compared to Koike's 37.7%. Could this give Swan a potential edge?
- In return games, Swan has proven stronger on opponents' second serves, winning 51.23% of points, while Koike registers at 48.25%.
- When it comes to first serve returns, Koike leads with a 31.28% win rate versus Swan's 27.75%. Does this bode well for Koike's defense?
- Swan has demonstrated better poise under pressure by saving 54.78% of breakpoints, as opposed to Koike's 46.12%.
- Over the past year, Swan boasts a superior match win rate of 69.23% (W/L 9/4), compared to Koike's 48.98% (W/L 24/25).
- Both players excel on indoor hard surfaces with a 67% win rate; however, Koike has a slightly higher clay win rate at 50% versus Swan's 40%.
- Swan has dominated in lower-tier tournaments, winning 87.5% of matches at the $10K level, while Koike shows more experience in higher-tier events with a 53.85% win rate.
- Swan has faced tougher opponents with an average rank of 374.15, compared to Koike's average opponent rank of 402.92.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Swan has a slight advantage with a 50% win rate, while Koike stands at 38%.
- Swan also leads in breakpoint conversion recently, successfully converting 42.31% of opportunities compared to Koike's 38.71%.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
Considering recent form and statistics, Swan exhibits a slight edge in several critical areas, particularly in second serve performance and under-pressure play. Swan's ability to win more points on return games and a higher breakpoint save percentage signifies strategic strength in pivotal moments.
Koike's advantage in first serve returns and clay performance may have less impact in this matchup, given the predicted surface and event context. Additionally, Swan's experience against higher-ranked opponents could play a crucial role.
Swan's achievements in converting breakpoint opportunities and handling deciding sets effectively further reinforce their preparedness to handle pressures during the match.
Based on these factors, Swan appears to have a more favorable projection for securing victory in this upcoming tennis match.
Katie Swan vs Ena Koike Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Swan vs E. Koike H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:30:35 | Average Match Time | 1:30:35 |
| 61% (27/44) | 1st Serve % | 72% (41/57) |
| 89% (24/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (25/41) |
| 76% (13/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 63% (10/16) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 39% (22/57) | Return Points Win % | 16% (7/44) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Swan Recent Matches Played
E. Koike Recent Matches Played

K. Swan vs E. Koike Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.40% (239/144) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.00% (66/54) |
| 62.12% (528/322) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.43% (153/123) |
| 55.35% (4245/3424) | Games Win/Loss | 53.13% (1339/1181) |
| 67.21% (166/81) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.06% (49/40) |
| 40.00% (14/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.00% (13/12) |
| 73.21% (41/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 40.00% (18/27) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1299 | Aces Total | 163 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 1406 | Total Double Faults | 397 |
| 1:28:37 | Average Match Time | 1:27:58 |
| 503.59 | Average Opponent Rank | 358.18 |
| 59% (12909/21757) | 1st Serve % | 60% (4077/6802) |
| 68% (8742/12909) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2570/4077) |
| 45% (3971/8856) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1269/2725) |
| 49% (1363/2806) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (350/755) |
| 46% (10236/22260) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2929/6646) |
| 37.04% (10/17) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38.46% (10/16) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 64.39% (179/99) | Challenger W/L | 56.04% (51/40) |
| 83.33% (35/7) | Futures W/L | 62.50% (15/9) |
| 64% (233/363) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (66/119) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (34/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (17/28) |
| 47% (47/101) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (16/37) |
| 86% (244/211) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (63/56) |
| 12% (244/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (63/7) |
| 20% (138/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (57/10) |